Madhapur restaurant row leads to cases against owners, tenant
HYDERABAD: A rent dispute involving Lucky Multicuisine Restaurant in Madhapur has led to separate police cases against the premises owners and restaurant operator. Both sides have made allegations over access to the property and rent payments.
Rehana, who identified herself as the owner of Madhapur Lucky Restaurant, alleged that she had paid ₹3.60 lakh in monthly rent for nearly six years. She said she regularly paid the rent and complied with Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) requirements.
Rehana alleged that the restaurant was later demolished. She also claimed that its water and electricity connections were disconnected and its food licence was cancelled.
She said she had invested heavily in the business and had bank statements to support her claims.
According to Madhapur Police, the dispute involves restaurant operator Mohammed Mansoor and premises owners Ravi, Hari and others. Police said Mansoor had taken the premises on lease but had not paid rent for the past few months.
Police allege obstruction of access
Police alleged that Ravi, Hari and others damaged the approach road to the restaurant after the rent dispute. They also allegedly obstructed access to the premises.
Police registered a case over the alleged obstruction. The matter remains under investigation.
The police said the dispute mainly concerns rent payments and the use of the premises.
Good afternoon to all.
Issue regarding Lucky Restaurant, Madhapur
Mohammed Mansoor, who is running Lucky Multicuisine Restaurant near Pillar No. 1723, Madhapur, had taken the premises on lease from Ravi, Hari and others. It is learnt that Mansoor has not been paying the rent for the past few months. The primary issue is an owner–tenant dispute relating to payment of rent and the use of the premises.
Due to the rent dispute, Ravi, Hari and others allegedly damaged the approach road/pathway leading to the restaurant and obstructed access to the premises. In this regard, a case was registered against them at Madhapur PS, and the matter is under investigation.
On 03.10.2026 at about 0010 hours, while the Madhapur Patrol Mobile was conducting night patrolling near the Indian Petrol Pump, Mohammed Mansoor, along with his wife and some others, allegedly came onto the road and obstructed the police vehicle. They sat on the road, causing obstruction to traffic and inconvenience to the general public.
They also allegedly obstructed the police personnel while they were discharging their official duties. In connection with this incident, a case was registered at Madhapur PS against Mohammed Mansoor and others. The matter is under investigation, and necessary legal action will be taken as per law.
It is also learnt that the FSSAI licence of Lucky Restaurant was suspended on 26.09.2026 due to food-safety and hygiene deficiencies noticed during inspection.
Regards:
SHO-Madhapur.— Madhapur Police Station (@psmadhapur_cyb) October 4, 2026
Separate case over alleged patrol vehicle obstruction
Madhapur Police also registered a separate case against Mansoor, his wife and others over an incident during night patrol on October 3, 2026.
According to police, a patrol vehicle was conducting night patrol near the Indian Petrol Pump around 12.10 am. Mansoor, his wife and some others allegedly came onto the road and blocked the vehicle.
Police alleged that the group sat on the road and obstructed traffic, causing inconvenience to the public. They also alleged that the group obstructed police personnel while they were performing their duties.
Police registered a separate case over the incident. Further action will follow as per law, police said.
FSSAI action follows inspection
The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) suspended the licence of Lucky Restaurant on September 26, 2026. The action followed an inspection that found food safety and hygiene deficiencies, according to the information provided.
Madhapur Police clarified that the FSSAI action was separate from the police cases. The police cases concern the rent and premises dispute and the alleged obstruction of the patrol vehicle.
